Main Article Content
Abstract
The trend of housing quality has become more intricate and has expanded to encompass all aspects of habitat. There are several significant challenges related to improving housing, both socially and in terms of economic and environmental considerations. Discussing the quality of new production methods requires an analysis based on various traditional criteria, using convenient indicators such as cleanliness, stability, safety, comfort, durability, flexibility, and aesthetic appeal.
The principal aim of this study is to provide an objective assessment of the quality of Participative Subsidized Housing (LPA) in the municipality of EL-Khroube in Algeria. The methodology employed integrates a field survey and a resident questionnaire to appraise the comfort level offered by this housing type as well as the level of resident satisfaction. The results of the on-site observation indicated that the living environment does not offer an adequate level of comfort. This finding was corroborated by the questionnaire results, which revealed a prevailing sentiment of dissatisfaction among residents. This dissatisfaction can be attributed to issues pertaining to interior comfort and a dearth of local infrastructure and facilities. The results of this study will assist housing stakeholders in enhancing this mode of production through a collaborative and participatory approach.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. Marianne C, Dussault C, (2013). Guide to the use of habitat quality models [In French : Guide d’utilisation des modèles de qualité de l’habitat]. DGEFH, Quebec. 25p. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/cdn-con-tenu/faune/documents/habitats/GM_modeles_qualite_habitat_MFFP.pdf
3. Pinson D, (2003). The design of housing [In French: La conception du lodgement]. Dictionary of habitat and housing. Paris: Armand Colin, p 82-86. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01567268/
4. Merlin P, Choay F, (2000). Dictionary of town planning and development [In French: Dictionnaire de l'urbanisme et de l'aménagement], PUF, 4th edition. 970p.
5. Pillemont J, (2002). Innovation Quality Regulation. Study report. CERFISE/PUCA, 58p. https://www.chantier.net/documents/0210pillemont.pdf
6. Biau V, Lautier F, (2004). Issues, Criteria and means of quality in housing opera-tions. [In French: Enjeux, critères et moy-ens de la qualité dans les opérations de logement]. Study report, CRESSA-CRH, Paris. 123p. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01714724
7. Fillod-Barbarino N, (2009), Practical Guide to Quality Housing. AUDAL, 112p. https://www.inter-scot.fr/wp-con-tent/uploads/2018/10/Guide_habitat_2009.pdf
8. Mazrag H, (2015), Collective social hous-ing: Between design and use Case of the city of M'sila. Thesis dissertation, Universi-ty of Biskra. http://thesis.univ-biskra.dz/id/eprint/1540
9. GCSDSH General Commission for Sustaina-ble Development, State of Housing, (2010). National sustainable development strategy 2010-2013: towards a green and equitable economy France. Study report, GCSDSH. 59p. https://www.hauts-de-france.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/sndd-2010-2013-2.pdf
10. Juliette S, (2023), Humidity: causes, solu-tions, treatment, hygrometry rate. PROMEE website website accessed on 11/03/2023. https://promee.fr/renovation-energetique/taux-humidite-maison-et-hygrometrie
11. Vellei M, Herrera M, Fosas D, & Natarajan S. (2017). The influence of relative humidi-ty on adaptive thermal comfort. Building and Environment, 124, 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.005
12. Patino, E. D. L & Siegel, J. A. (2018). Indoor environmental quality in social housing: A literature review. Building and Environ-ment, 131, 231-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.013
13. Cabanieu.J & Galibourg J. M. (1999). Public buildings: Architecture and HQE. Study re-port. MIQCP, 70p.https://www.miqcp.gouv.fr/images/Guides/documentPDF/g8texte.pdf