Main Article Content
Abstract
Industrial heritage, encompassing both tangible and intangible evidence of industry history, holds profound cultural and historical significance. However, this heritage is often abandoned and neglected, as seen in the El Hamma district of Algiers, the capital of Algeria. The study aims to determine the priority order for the preservation of these industrial buildings, emphasizing the methods and priorities necessary to protect this invaluable heritage. The research methods involve introducing a comprehensive framework for evaluating the potential reuse of industrial heritage through a GIS-AHP methodology, assessing factors such as historical importance and architectural value. Employing the methodology of Weighted Overlay Analysis (WOA) in ArcGIS, the study categorizes sites for preservation or potential demolition, providing stakeholders with valuable insights into conservation priorities. The research results underscore the crucial importance of heritage preservation in maintaining local identity and promoting sustainable urban development. These findings highlight the need for an interdisciplinary strategy that balances economic growth with heritage conservation, ensuring the cultural and historical significance of the El Hamma district is safeguarded.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. Erder, C. (1977). The Venice Charter under review. Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Ankara, 24–31.
3. Council of Europe. (1985). The convention for the protection of Architectural Herit-age of Europe (Granada Convention).
4. Australia ICOMOS. (1999). The charter for the conservation of places of cultural sig-nificance (The Burra Charter), 1979 (re-vised in 1999).
5. Vecco, M. (2010). A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangi-ble. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(3), 321–324.
6. TICCIH. (2003). The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage Russian.
7. Lipe, W. D. (1974). A conservation model for American archaeology. Kiva, 39, 213–245.
8. Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Jour-nal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281.
9. Saaty, T., & Vargas, L. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer.
10. San-José, J.T., Losada, R., Cuadrado, J., & Garrucho, I. (2007). Approach to the quan-tification of the sustainable value in indus-trial buildings. Building and Environment, 42, 3916–3923.
11. San-José Lombera, J.T., & Garrucho Aprea, I. (2010). A system approach to the envi-ronmental analysis of industrial buildings. Building and Environment, 45, 673–683.
12. Morkunaitė, Ž., Kalibatas, D., & Kaliba-tienė, D. (2019). A bibliometric data analy-sis of multi-criteria decision making meth-ods in heritage buildings. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25, 76–99.
13. Misirlisoy, D., & Günçe, K. (2016). Adaptive reuse strategies for heritage buildings: A holistic approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 91–98.
14. Berta, M., Bottero, M., & Ferretti, V. (2018). A mixed methods approach for the
integration of urban design and economic evaluation: Industrial heritage and urban regeneration in China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Sci-ence, 45.
15. Aigwi, I.E., Egbelakin, T., Ingham, J., Phipps, R., Rotimi, J., & Filippova, O. (2019). A performance-based framework to prioritise underutilised historical build-ings for adaptive reuse interventions in New Zealand. Sustainable Cities and Socie-ty, 48, 101547.
16. Claver, J., García-Domínguez, A., & Sebas-tián, M.A. (2018). Decision-Making Meth-odologies for Reuse of Industrial Assets. Complexity, 2018.
17. Haroun, H.A.A.F., Bakr, A.F., & Hasan, A.E.S. (2019). Multi-criteria decision mak-ing for adaptive reuse of heritage build-ings: Aziza Fahmy Palace, Alexandria, Egypt. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58, 467–478.
18. Okutan, R.S., Kershaw, T., Fernandez, M.H., & Coley, D. (2018). A socio-mathematical approach to exploring conflicts between energy retrofit and perceived heritage character. Building and Environment, 138, 11–20.
19. Claver, J., García-Domínguez, A., & Sebas-tián, M. A. (2018). Decision-making meth-odologies for reuse of industrial assets. Complexity, 2018.
20. Meng, F., Zhi, Y., & Pang, Y. (2023). As-sessment of the Adaptive Reuse Potentiali-ty of Industrial Heritage Based on Im-proved Entropy TOPSIS Method from the Perspective of Urban Regeneration. Sus-tainability, 15(9), 7735.
21. TICCIH. (2003). The Nizhny Tagil Charter for the Industrial Heritage Russian.
22. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural organization World Heritage Cen-tre. (2016). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage con-vention.
23. Boying, L., & Kuang, L. (2006). Formation of industrial heritage and method of value evaluation. Archit. Creation, 9, 24–30.
24. Dutta, M., & Husain, Z. (2009). An applica-tion of multi-criteria decision making to build heritage: The case of Calcutta. J. Cult. Herit., 10, 237–243.
25. Charte NIZHNY TAGIL pour le patrimoine industriel, juillet 2003.
26. ICOMOS, TICCIH, (2011). The Dublin prin-ciples, Adopted by the 17th ICOMOS Gen-eral Assembly. Paris
27. Fiblec, H. (1992). Friese Paul. Architec-tures de l’Age Industriel. NORMA edition.
28. Ambrière, M,( 1997). Dictionnaire du XIX e siècle européen. Presse Universitaire Française.
29. Laborde, M F. ( 2003). Architecture indus-trielle Paris & alentours, 2nd edition, édi-tions Parigramme.
30. De Roux,E & Fessy, G. (2000). PATRI-MOINE INDUSTRIEL, éditions du patri-moine et éditions SCALA.
31. Guo, P. (2018). Studies on the Scheme Evaluation for Regeneration Old Industrial Building. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, China.
32. Wang, T. (2019). Research on the Renova-tion of Old Industrial Plants from the Per-spective of Open Architecture—Taking Ji-nan No.1 Machine Tool Plant as an Exam-ple. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, China.
33. Langston, C., Wong, F.K., Hui, E.C., & Shen, L.Y. (2008). Strategic assessment of build-ing adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Build. Environ., 43, 1709–1718.
34. Bo, H. (2019). Research on the Strategy of Regeneration of Industrial Remains In the Stock Ear—A Case Study of the Urban
Regeneration of Shou Gang Park in Beijing. Ph.D. Thesis, Southeast University, Nan-jing, China.
35. Zolekar RB, Bhagat VS (2015) Multi-criteria land suitability analysis for agricul-ture in hilly zone: remote sensing and GIS approach. Comput Electron Agric 118:300–321
36. Cengiz T, Akbulak C (2009) Application of analytical hierarchy process and geo-graphic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation: a case study of Du¨mrek village (C¸ anakkale, Turkey). Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 16:286–294
37. Pramanik MK (2016) Site suitability analy-sis for agricultural land use of Darjeeling district using AHP and GIS techniques. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:1–22
38. Algérie/Alger Planification, L’Institut Paris Région (2008). Schéma Directeur d’Aménagement de l’Aire Métropolitaine d’Alger Horizon 2030.
39. Beuscher F.(1931), Les Halles Centrales d’Alger. Avant l’inauguration. Journal Echos d’Alger des 3/8 et 9 Mai. In : http://alger-roi.fr/Alger/sadi_carnot/pages_liees/18_halles_centrales60_venis.htm#trois_heures
40. Sendra L.( 1933). Trois heures du matin aux Halles. Journal Echos d’Alger 19-01-1933. In: http://alger-roi.fr/Alger/sadi_carnot/pages_liees/18_halles_centrales60_venis.htm#trois_heures.