##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Submitted
Jun 13, 2024
Published
Sep 9, 2024
Download
Statistic
Read Counter : 147
Download : 89
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores Algerian EFL Master’s students’ attitudes toward using AI Generators like QuillBot and ChatGPT to AI-giarize. The researchers selected 66 Algerian EFL Master’s students from the University of Saida, Dr. Moulay Tahar, Algeria. The study adopted a semi-structured questionnaire and an analysis of three selected Master’s theses. The results indicated that students shared positive attitudes toward AI generators in plagiarising, including QuillBot. The findings also revealed that the students had poor knowledge acknowledging the use of these generators. The results also showed that the students received no guidance from their teachers and supervisors on the advantages of these generators in academic writing and raising their awareness against their use to plagiarize. The study concludes that AI generators harm the Algerian educational system if case institutions and universities do not put regulations and raise teachers’ and students’ awareness toward their use.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Ghounane, N., Rahmani, A., & Al-Zubaidi, K. (2024). Exploring Algerian EFL Master’s Students’ Attitudes Toward AI-giarism. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 444-459. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.05.02.07
References
1. Alhalangy A. G. I., & AbdAlgane, M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of AI on the EFL Con-text: A Case of Study of Saudi Universities. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.125
2. Alzahrani, L. (2023). Analyzing Students’ Attitudes and Behavior toward Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Higher Educa-tion. International Journal of Recent Tech-nology and Engineering (IJRTE), 11(6), 65-73. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.F7475.0311623
3. Amanda, Sukma, E. M., Lubis, N., & Dewi, U. (2023).Quillbot as an AI-Powered Eng-lish Writing Assistant: An Alternative for Students to Write English. Jurnal Pendidi-kan dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 188-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026
4. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). Is AI Changing Rules of Academic Misconduct? An In-depth Look at Students’ Perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’. Computer and Society, 2, 1-19. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.03358.pdf
5. Chan, C. K., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Ben-efits, and Challenges in Higher Educa-tion. ArXiv, abs/2305.00290.
6. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT.
Innovations in Education and Teaching In-ternational, 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
7. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
8. Dragidella, K. (2022). What is Aigiarism? Available at https://crossplag.com/what-is-aigiarism/
9. Gao, J. (2021). Exploring the feedback quality of an automated writing evaluation system Pigai. International Journal. Emerging. Technological in Learning, 16(11), 322–330. Available at https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/19657
10. Hieu, B. V., Huy, H. M., & Hang, C. T. (2022). Employing The QuillBot Applica-tion in Order to Sharpen Paraphrasing Skills in Writing Academic Essays For Eng-lish-Majored Students at the School of For-eign Languages -Thai Nguyen University. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 227(13), 116-124.
11. Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Abid Azhar, K. (2023). Exploring Teachers’ Attitudes To-wards Using ChatGPT. Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97-111. DOI:10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163
12. Jiang, R. (2022). How Does Artificial Intel-ligence Empower EFL Teaching and Learn-ing Nowadays? A Review on Artificial In-telligence in the EFL Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psycholo-gy/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401/full#B28
13. Kim, N.J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tools for Scientific Writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
14. Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., Benites, A. D., Lehr, C., & Sanchez-Stockhammer, C. (2022). Neural machine translation in for-eign language teaching and learning: a systematic review. Educational. Infor-mation. Technology, 27, 1–20. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11194-2
15. Kurniati, e. y., & Fithriani,R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teach-ing and Linguistics, 7(3), 437-451.
16. Nur Aqiilah, K. Z. (2023). Online Para-phrasing Tools in EFL Academic Writing: Problems, Affordances, and Students’ Feel-ings, (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Uni-versitas Kristen Satya Wacana. Available at https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/30095
17. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity Considerations of AI Large Language Mod-els in the Post-Pandemic Era: ChatGPT and Beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/ 10.53761/1.20.02.07 https://idratherbewriting.com/trends/trends-to-follow-or-forget-language-generative-ai.html
18. Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2022). What are Au-tomated Paraphrasing Tools and How do we address them? A Review of a Growing Threat to Academic Integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(15), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w
19. Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A Review of AI-Powered Writing Tools and their Implications for Academic Integrity in the Language Classroom. Jour-nal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 22-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035
20. Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the use of AI in a writing class. Proceed-ings of the 67th Teflin International Virtual Conference and the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Re-search, 624. 52-57. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125970061.pdf
21. Sumakul, D. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class. Proceedings from the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Con-ference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 624, 52-57.
22. Syahnaz, M., & Fihriani, R. (2023). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-based Paraphrasing Tool in EFL Writing Class: A Focus on In-donesian University Students’ Perceptions. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210-218.
23. Vera, F. (2023). Integrating Artificial Intel-ligence (AI) in the EFL Classroom: Benefits and Challenges. Revista Electrónica Trans-formar Transformar Electronic Journal, 4(2), 66-77.
24. Woo, D. J., Susanto, H., Yeung, C. S., Guo, K., Fung, A. K. Y. (2023). Exploring AI-Generated Text in Student Writing: How Does AI Help? Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368986199
25. Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Au-thorship Apps. Tesol Journal, (e716). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716
2. Alzahrani, L. (2023). Analyzing Students’ Attitudes and Behavior toward Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Higher Educa-tion. International Journal of Recent Tech-nology and Engineering (IJRTE), 11(6), 65-73. DOI: 10.35940/ijrte.F7475.0311623
3. Amanda, Sukma, E. M., Lubis, N., & Dewi, U. (2023).Quillbot as an AI-Powered Eng-lish Writing Assistant: An Alternative for Students to Write English. Jurnal Pendidi-kan dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 188-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v3i2.2026
4. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). Is AI Changing Rules of Academic Misconduct? An In-depth Look at Students’ Perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’. Computer and Society, 2, 1-19. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.03358.pdf
5. Chan, C. K., & Hu, W. (2023). Students' Voices on Generative AI: Perceptions, Ben-efits, and Challenges in Higher Educa-tion. ArXiv, abs/2305.00290.
6. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT.
Innovations in Education and Teaching In-ternational, 1-13. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
7. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
8. Dragidella, K. (2022). What is Aigiarism? Available at https://crossplag.com/what-is-aigiarism/
9. Gao, J. (2021). Exploring the feedback quality of an automated writing evaluation system Pigai. International Journal. Emerging. Technological in Learning, 16(11), 322–330. Available at https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/19657
10. Hieu, B. V., Huy, H. M., & Hang, C. T. (2022). Employing The QuillBot Applica-tion in Order to Sharpen Paraphrasing Skills in Writing Academic Essays For Eng-lish-Majored Students at the School of For-eign Languages -Thai Nguyen University. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 227(13), 116-124.
11. Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Abid Azhar, K. (2023). Exploring Teachers’ Attitudes To-wards Using ChatGPT. Global Journal for Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97-111. DOI:10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163
12. Jiang, R. (2022). How Does Artificial Intel-ligence Empower EFL Teaching and Learn-ing Nowadays? A Review on Artificial In-telligence in the EFL Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Available at https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psycholo-gy/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401/full#B28
13. Kim, N.J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tools for Scientific Writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
14. Klimova, B., Pikhart, M., Benites, A. D., Lehr, C., & Sanchez-Stockhammer, C. (2022). Neural machine translation in for-eign language teaching and learning: a systematic review. Educational. Infor-mation. Technology, 27, 1–20. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-022-11194-2
15. Kurniati, e. y., & Fithriani,R. (2022). Post-Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Quillbot Utilization in English Academic Writing Class. Journal of English Language Teach-ing and Linguistics, 7(3), 437-451.
16. Nur Aqiilah, K. Z. (2023). Online Para-phrasing Tools in EFL Academic Writing: Problems, Affordances, and Students’ Feel-ings, (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Uni-versitas Kristen Satya Wacana. Available at https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/30095
17. Perkins, M. (2023). Academic Integrity Considerations of AI Large Language Mod-els in the Post-Pandemic Era: ChatGPT and Beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/ 10.53761/1.20.02.07 https://idratherbewriting.com/trends/trends-to-follow-or-forget-language-generative-ai.html
18. Roe, J., & Perkins, M. (2022). What are Au-tomated Paraphrasing Tools and How do we address them? A Review of a Growing Threat to Academic Integrity. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(15), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00109-w
19. Roe, J., Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2023). A Review of AI-Powered Writing Tools and their Implications for Academic Integrity in the Language Classroom. Jour-nal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 22-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1035
20. Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ perceptions of the use of AI in a writing class. Proceed-ings of the 67th Teflin International Virtual Conference and the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Re-search, 624. 52-57. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125970061.pdf
21. Sumakul, D. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Students’ Perceptions of the Use of AI in a Writing Class. Proceedings from the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Con-ference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (TEFLIN ICOELT 2021). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research, 624, 52-57.
22. Syahnaz, M., & Fihriani, R. (2023). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-based Paraphrasing Tool in EFL Writing Class: A Focus on In-donesian University Students’ Perceptions. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210-218.
23. Vera, F. (2023). Integrating Artificial Intel-ligence (AI) in the EFL Classroom: Benefits and Challenges. Revista Electrónica Trans-formar Transformar Electronic Journal, 4(2), 66-77.
24. Woo, D. J., Susanto, H., Yeung, C. S., Guo, K., Fung, A. K. Y. (2023). Exploring AI-Generated Text in Student Writing: How Does AI Help? Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368986199
25. Yeo, M. A. (2023). Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Au-thorship Apps. Tesol Journal, (e716). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.716