Main Article Content
Abstract
Rice for the Poor (Raskin) is a government programme to help the poor and food insecure so that they can get cheap rice for their household needs. Problems were found related to this programme policy where the implementation of Raskin rice distribution was still uneven and there was no balance between the Raskin quota and Raskin rice recipients, the number of Raskin received was less than the number of RTMs, the Pagadungan Village Raskin payment was delayed, the Raskin distribution mechanism was long and convoluted sometimes and the quality of Raskin received by RTMs in Pagadungan Village was not in accordance with Bulog's quality standards. Based on this problem, the researcher formulates the main problem in this study, namely How does the Raskin programme affect the welfare of poor families in Pagadungan Village, Karangtanjung District, Pandeglang Regency? With the aim to find out how and how strong the influence of Raskin programme on the welfare of poor families in Pagadungan Village, Karangtanjung Sub-district, Pandeglang Regency. The research was conducted in the first semester of fiscal year 2024 by using descriptive quantitative research approach and method, with the target population oriented research of 497 people and random sample of 83 people. Data collection techniques were carried out through field observations and closed questionnaires. The analysis technique in the research is simple linear regression analysis technique with product moment correlation test. The results of the study can be concluded that the price of tcount> ttable is 13.760> 1.663, then the hypothesis is stated H0 (null hypothesis) is rejected and Ha (alternative hypothesis) is accepted, thus the hypothesis is stated that there is an influence of the Raskin Program on improving the welfare of poor families in Pagadungan Village, Karangtanjung District, Pandeglang Regency, with a correlation value of r = 0.837 which means that the level of influence of the Raskin Program on improving the welfare of poor families is interpreted to have a very strong relationship. Determination correlation of 0.700 which means that the influence of Raskin distribution programme can affect the welfare of poor families 70%, while the remaining 30% is caused by other factors.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. Agustino, Leo. 2006. Dasar-Dasar Ke-bijakan Publik. Bandung : CV. Alfabeta
3. Buku Petunjuk Teknis Raskin Tahun 2011 dari Menteri Koordinator Bidang Kese-jahteraan Rakyat Republik Indonesia.
4. Buku Petunjuk Teknis (juknis) Proses Penyaluran/ Pendistribusian Raskin di Kecamatan Karangtanjung Tahun 2015
5. Buku Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja In-tansi Pemerintah (LAKIP) Kelurahan Pa-gadungan Tahun 2023
6. Depkes RI. 1997. Prosperous Family.
7. Decree of the Regent of Pandeglang Num-ber 15 of 2002 Concerning the Main Duties and Functions of the Regional Device Or-ganization of Pandeglang Regency
8. Decree of the RegentNumber 440/kep. 18-Huk/2024Concerning the Establishmentof Criteria for PoorFamilies and Residents in Pandeglang Regency in 2024.
9. Decree of the District Head of Karangtan-jung Number: 400/04-Raskin/Kec./2024 Concerning the Determination of the Al-location Ceiling for the Distribution of Rice for Poor Households (Raskin) for Vil-lages in Karangtanjung District in 2024
10. Decree of the Head of Pagadungan Village Number: 400/03-Kesos/II/2024 Concerning the Establishment of the Task Force (Satgas) for the Distribution of Rice for Poor Households (Raskin) in Pagadungan Village, Karangtanjung Dis-trict, Pandeglang Regency in 2024
11. Garna, Judistira K. 2000, Metode Penelitian Sosial : Penelitian Dalam Ilmu Pemerintahan, Bandung : Primako Akade-mika.
12. George R. Terry, 2000. Dasar-Dasar Ma-najemen. (edisi bahasa Indonesia). Ban-dung : PT. Bumi Aksara.
13. Government Regulation No. 68 of 2002 Concerning Food Security.
14. Government Regulation No. 7 of 2003 Con-cerning the Establishment of the Public Company Bulog.
15. Law No. 32 of 2004 on Regional Govern-ment.
16. Law No. 7 of 1996 on Food
17. Law No. 47 of 2009. About the State Reve-nue and Expenditure Budget for the 2010 Fiscal Year
18. Rakhmat, J. 2004. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosda-karya
19. Riant Nugroho. 2003. Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta : PT Elex Media Komputindo
20. Simbolon, Maringan Masri. 2004. Dasar-dasar Administrasi dan Manajemen. Jakar-ta : Ghalia Indonesia
21. Suud, Mohammad. 2006. 3 Orientasi Kese-jahteraan Sosial.Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka
22. Sugiyono, 2005, Metode Penelitian Kuali-tatif, Bandung: Alfabeta.
23. Sugiyono, 2006, Statistika Untuk Penelitian,Cetakan Ketujuh, Bandung: CV. Alfabeta Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. CV.Alfabeta: Bandung.
24. Syafaruddin. 2008. Kebijakan Publik. Ja-karta. Rineka Cipta
25. Syafiie, 2003, Sistem Administrasi Nega-ra Republik Indonesia (SANRI). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
26. Syafiie, 2009, Sistem Administrasi publik Republik Indonesia (SANKRI). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
27. Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 13 of 2009 Concerning Co-ordination of Poverty Alleviation