Main Article Content
Abstract
Efforts to develop remote villages frequently face complex challenges that require multi-stakeholder collaboration. This research examines the development efforts of Sungai Lisai Village, located in the Kerinci Seblat National Park area of Lebong Regency, Bengkulu, as a Remote Indigenous Community (KAT) using the Pentahelix model. The research objective is to identify stakeholder involvement in Pentahelix elements and analyze their respective roles in the context of village development. The research method used a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection through interviews, document analysis, and direct observation. Data analysis in this study used the Miles and Huberman interactive model. The results showed the involvement of stakeholders from four Pentahelix elements, namely: government (Pemda, Dinsos, PUPR, TNI AD), community (village institutions, residents, NGOs), academics (Bengkulu University), and media (RB TV, RMOL Bengkulu, Bengkulu Ekspress), while business elements have not been identified. Each stakeholder has a specific role, but the synergy between elements is still not very strong. The research also revealed the rejection of the proposal to recognize Sungai Lisai Village as KAT by the Ministry of Social Affairs in 2022, despite ongoing empowerment efforts. The recommendations based on the research results include strengthening collaboration between stakeholders, increasing the capacity of local communities, developing an integrated evaluation and monitoring system, and focusing on improving village accessibility. Thus, the Pentahelix approach can be more effective in supporting the development of Sungai Lisai Village, regardless of its status as KAT or not.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. ILO, “Decent Work and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” Int. Labour Organ., 2024.
3. G. Nhamo, K. Dube, and D. Chikodzi, “Sustainable Development Goals: Concept and Challenges of Global Development Goal Setting,” in Handbook of Global Health: With 362 Figures and 152 Tables, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45009-0_79.
4. A. H. Iskandar, “SDGs desa : percepatan pencapaian tujuan pembangunan nasional berkelanjutan,” J. Wacana Kinerja, 2020.
5. R. N. Andari, “Resensi: SDGs Desa, Percepatan Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Nasional Berkelanjutan,” J. Wacana Kinerja Kaji. Prakt. Kinerja dan Adm. Pelayanan Publik, vol. 24, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.31845/jwk.v24i1.713.
6. Badan Pusat Statistik, “Statistik Indonesia: Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia 2020,” Badan Stat. Indones., 2020.
7. Y. Yovinus and N. Nikodimus, “Implementasi Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal,” FOKUS Publ. Ilm. untuk Mahasiswa, Staf Pengajar dan Alumni Univ. Kapuas Sintang, vol. 20, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.51826/fokus.v20i2.650.
8. T. N. Aziza and D. W. Srimarchea, “Penanganan Daerah Tertinggal Di Indonesia,” J. Khazanah Intelekt., vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37250/khazanah.v7i1.185.
9. A. Bakar and A. Ghofur, “Problematika Pemberdayaan Komunitas Adat Terpencil (KAT) Suku Sakai di Kecamatan Bathin Solapan Kabupaten Bengkalis,” Toler. Media Ilm. Komun. Umat Beragama, vol. 9, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.24014/trs.v9i1.4325.
10. E. Nurwahyuliningsih, S. A. Nulhaqim, and H. A. Rachim, “Pemberdayaan Komunitas Adat Terpencil Suku Anak Dalam Melalui Program Pendidikan,” Aliansi J. Polit. Keamanan Dan Hub. Int., vol. 0, no. 2829–1794, 2022.
11. L. Leydesdorff, “Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations,” in Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_452.
12. R. A. Utami and N. D. Novikarumsari, “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Petani Kopi Lego Menuju Agrowisata Berkelanjutan dalam Perspektif Pentahelix Model di Gombengsari, Kabupaten Banyuwangi,” J. KIRANA, vol. 3, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.19184/jkrn.v3i1.31142.
13. Humas Kota Bandung, “Bandung Connecticity 2.0: Collaboration to Build a World Class City of Bandung,” Portal Bandung, 2022.
14. Afrizal, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.
15. L. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, vol. 1, no. 1. 2020.
16. M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, vol. 30, no. 25. 2016.
17. J. W. Creswell, Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Desain Riset Memilih Antara Lima Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014.
18. M. Q. Patton, “Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice - Michael Quinn Patton - Google Books,” Sage Publication. 2014.
19. T. A. Birkland, An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts and models of public policy making. 2019. doi: 10.4324/9781315292335.
20. J. . Anderson, “Public Policy Making: An Introduction Fifth Edition,” Anderson. 2003.
21. J. W. Kingdon, Pearson new international edition : Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies John W. Kingdon Second Edition. 2014.
22. F. Fischer and G. J. Miller, Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315093192.
23. L. May, “Digital Media and Democracy,” in Media and Feminist Protest in Iran, 2023. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-44861-4_4.
24. H. Antlöv, A. Wetterberg, and ..., “Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia,” Bull. Indones. …, 2016, doi: 10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047.
25. L. Setiana, Teknik penuluhan dan pemberdayaan masyarakat. Risman F. Sikumbank, 2002.
26. E. C. K. Cheng, “Leveraging knowledge through communities of practice,” in Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era, 2017. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3344-5_6.
27. S. Kruahong, T. Tankumpuan, K. Kelly, P. M. Davidson, and P. Kuntajak, “Community empowerment: A concept analysis,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 79, no. 8. 2023. doi: 10.1111/jan.15613.
28. N. Banks, D. Hulme, and M. Edwards, “NGOs, States, and Donors Revisited: Still Too Close for Comfort?,” World Dev., vol. 66, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.028.
29. N. L. Peluso and C. Lund, “New frontiers of land control: Introduction,” J. Peasant Stud., vol. 38, no. 4, 2011, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607692.
30. New Frontiers of Land Control. 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203720455.