##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Submitted
Oct 15, 2022
Published
Dec 9, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 167 Download : 229

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The establishment of KelompokInformasiMasyarakat (KIM) in Pandeglang Regency by the Pandeglang Regency Communication, Code and Statistics Office is expected to be a mouthpiece between the Pandeglang Regency Government and disadvantaged rural communities in developing information literacy. Through a qualitative approach with descriptive research methods, this study focuses on the role of KIM in developing information literacy in underdeveloped villages. This study seeks to find out the role of KIM in conducting information literacy about the Pandeglang Regency government program. The results of the study show the role of KIM in developing information literacy for the people of Pandeglang Regency, collecting, informing and managing information about programs that are being and will be run by the Pandeglang Regency government in 16 underdeveloped villages that are still difficult to access the internet, such as educating about COVID-19, conducting program socialization " JakaMantul". The recommendation of this research is for KIM to carry out its role more massively by utilizing various media in disseminating information in underdeveloped villages.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Annisarizki, A., & Mardiana, S. (2022). The Role of Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat (KIM) in Developing Public Information Literacy in Pandeglang Regency. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.03.02.02

References

Andrianto, & Elvinaro. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Public Relations Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Annisarizki, & Surahman, S. (2022). Upaya Komunikasi Publik Pemerintah Kota Cilegon dalam Mengedukasi Masyarakat pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 20(2), 2022.
Arikunto. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Dilla, S. (2007). Komunikasi Pembangunan Pendekatan Terpadu. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
Idrus, M. (2009). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Edisi Kedua. Erlangga.
Ifap. (2013). Informations for All Programme (IFAP): Towards Information Literacy Indicator ”.
Kornienko, A. A., V, A., Fovanov, O. B., & Chubik, M. P. (2015). The Nature of knowledge power in communicative information society. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 2015.

Melani, S. (2016). Literasi Informasi dalam Praktik Sosial. Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 10(02), 2016.
Mukti, A., & Winata, R. A. (2021). Kelompok Informasi dan Masyarakat Informasi (Studi Kasus Konstribusi Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat dalam Mewujudkan Masyarakat Informasi di Kota Magelang. Jurnal ILmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 2(2), 2021.
Shao, & Purpur. (2016). Effects of Infor-mation Literacy Skills on Student Writingand Course Performance. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.006.
Trisnani. (2017). Peran KIM Daerah Tertinggal dalam Memanage Informasi untuk Meningkatkan Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan Masyarakat Sekitar. Jurnal Komunikasi Media Dan Informasi, 6(April), 2017.
UNESCO. (2008). United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
Wahyudi, H. (2017). Kelompok Informasi Masyarakat. Kementrian Informasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia (p. 2017). Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.
Widiastuti, N. (2021). Transformasi Humas di Era Digital. Direktorat Jendral Informasi dan Komunikasi Publik Kementeriann Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.