Main Article Content

Abstract

Environmental considerations or individual intentions influence taxpayer behavior. VAT changes may be a reaction to behavior either overtly or covertly. This research applies an approach approach with the method of interviews conducted with business actors. However, VAT can reduce profits by influencing consumers to spend resources and look for lower prices. Regarding the VAT rate, it is still considered unfair. Furthermore, double recording or splitting the business into several forms is implemented, which is passed on to other family members. Another option is to do tax planning to meet the tax burden. Decisions in the information action model can be based on rationality, routine behavior, nature/tradition and subjective norms / perceptual behavior. Findings from an environmental perspective are formed from the level of experience and age, as well as the encouragement of social communities and provide psychological stimuli for taxpayer behavior in assessing changes in tax regulations, especially about VAT rates.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibowo, D. (2024). Psychological Social Behavior: Taxable Entrepreneurs Respond to Vat Policy Changes. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.05.01.09

References

1. Adawiah, D. 2011. Analisis Penerapan perencanaan Pajak Atas Biaya Kese-jahteraan Karyawan pada Yayasan Al-Muhajirin Kota Depok. Skripsi. Universi-tas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah. Ja-karta.
2. Agustiantono, Dwi. 2012. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi: Aplikasi TPB (Studi empiris WPOP di Kabupaten Pati, Skripsi, Universitas Diponegoro. Sema-rang.
3. Aldino Gumilar Rahayu. 2013. Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi (Pendekatan Tech-nology Acceptance Model) Dan E-Filling Terhadap User Satisfaction (Survey Pada Wajib Pajak Badan Di Wilayah KPP Madya Bandung).
4. Atmojo, M. D., Rahayu, S. M. & Budihardjo, O. 2016. Analisis Penerapan Perencanaan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (Studi Kasus pa-da CV Guyub Rukun Putra Sakti Tahun Pa-jak 2014). Jurnal Perpajakan (JEJAK), 8(1), 1–11.
5. Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Beck, R. C. 1990. Motivation. Englewood Cliffs,. N J.: Prentice-Hall.
7. Bitner, Z. 2013. Reassement Of Expecta-tions As A Compaison Standar In Measur-ing Service Quality: Implication For Fu-ther Reseacrh. Journal Of Marketing, 58, 111–124.
8. Block, J., Sandner, P. & Spiegel, F. 2009. Do Risk Attitudes Differ Within A Group Of Entrepreneurs? The Role Of Motiva-tion. Munich Personal Repec Archive, Pa-per No 17587.
9. Catania, A. C. 1988. the Behavior of Organ-isms As Work in Progress. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50(2), 277–281. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-277.
10. Dharmawan, G. B. 2015. Pengaruh Norma Subyektif, Pemahaman Terhadap Sistem Self Assessment, Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepatuhan Perpajakan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Universitas Brawi-jaya., 4(1), 1-12.
11. Edwards, J. M. 2012. The history of the use of self-reports and the methodology of economics. Journal of Economic Meth-odology, 19(4), 237–374.
12. Eysenck, H. J. 1970. Contingencies of rein-forcement: A theoretical analysis. Skinner, B. F., New York: appleton-century-crofts, 1969. xiv + 319 pp. $6.00. Behavior Ther-apy, 1(2), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(70)80039-9.
13. I, G. B. S., Rooswdjajani, & Ratri, A. M. 2017. Hubungan Bauran Pemasaran Dengan Kepuasan Konsumen (Studi Pada Konsumen Kafe Grow Malang). 4(2), 165–171.
14. Icek, Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t.
15. Jotopurnomo, C., & Mangoting, Y. 2013. Pengaruh Kesadaran Wajib Pajak, Kuali-tas Pelayanan Fiskus , Sanksi Perpajakan, Lingkungan Wajib Pajak Berada Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Di Surabaya. Tax & Accounting Review, 1(1), 49-54.
16. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1979. "Pro-spect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions under Risk." Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
17. Kirzner, I. 1979. Perception, opportunity and profit. IL: University of Chicago Press.
18. Knight, F. 1921. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (online Ed.). . In Houghton Mifflin Company. Retrieved July (Vol. 20, p. 2004).
19. Kuratko D. F. & Hodgetts. 1996. Entrepre-neurship, A Contemporary Approach 3th ed. Dryden Press.
20. Lim, K. L. 2013. Investment Intentions: A Consumer Behaviour Framework (Doc-toral dissertation, University of Western Australia).
21. MacKo, A., & Tyszka, T. 2009. Entrepre-neurship and risk taking. Applied Psy-chology, 58(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00402.x.
22. Mangoting, A. O. F. dan Y. 2012. Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Petugas Pajak , Sanksi Perpajakan dan Biaya Kepatuhan Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Umkm. Tax & Accounting Review, 1(1), 18–27.
23. Mangoting, Y. 1999. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. 1(1), 43–53.
24. Mansury, R. (1996). Pajak Penghasilan Lanjutan . Jakarta: IND-HILL.
25. Mardiasmo. 2018. Perpajakan Edisi Revisi Tahun 2018. In Penerbit Andi.
26. Maslow, A. H. 1943. A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
27. Megasari, C. 2008. Penerapan Tax Plan-ning Untuk Meminimalkan Pajak Per-tambahan Nilai Terutang Pada PT. Wijaya Karya Beton Wilayah Penjualan Sumatera Utara Medan. Skripsi. Universitas Su-matera Utara. Fakultas Ekonomi. Medan.
28. Moko P. Astamoen. 2005. Entrepreneur-ship. Alfabet.
29. Moore, C. F. 1986. Understanding Entre-preneurial Behavior: A Definition and Model.
30. Morris, M. and Schindehutte, M. 2005. En-trepreneurial Values and the Ethnic En-terprise: an examination of six subcul-tures. Journal of Small Business Manage-ment, 43(3), 453–479.
31. Morrison, A. 2000. Entrepreneurship: what triggers it? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 6(2), 59–71.
32. Ojong, N., & Obeng-Odoom, F. 2017. Resil-ience and Dynamism of Embedded Finan-cial Transactions in Cameroon. Journal of Economic Issues, 51(1), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1287508.
33. Pavlov, I. P. 1927. Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activ-ity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford Univ. Press.
34. Putra, A. D. 2016. Pengaruh Bauran Pemasaran Terhadap Kepuasan Pelang-gan Pada Pt. Telekomunikasi Tbk Di Su-rabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Manajemen, 5(9), 1689–1699.
35. Quintal, V. A., Lee, J. A., & Soutar, G. N. 2010. Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example. Tourism Management, 31(6), 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.006.
36. Rosdiana, H., & Tarigan, R. (2005). Perpa-jakan Teori dan Apliaksi. Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Persada.
37. Sedyati, A. P. S. S. K. & R. N. 2017. Per-ilaku Kewirausahaan Pengusaha Mebel di Desa Suco Kecamatan Mumbulsari Kabu-paten Jember.
38. Skinner, B. F. 1938. The behavior of or-ganisms: an experimental analysis. In The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
39. Steers, R. M. dan Porter, L. W. 1991. Moti-vation and work behaviour. McGraw-Hill.
40. Sugiyono. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bisnis Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.
41. Suminarsasi, W. S. (2012). Pengaruh Keadilan, Sistem Perpajakan, Dan Dis-kriminasi Terhadap Persepsi Wajib Pajak Mengenai Etika Penggelapan Pajak (Tax Evasion). SNA 15 Banjarmasin, 1(2 (ok-tober)), 0–29.
42. Suronoto, V. F. 2013. Penerapan Tax Planning Pajak Pertambahan Nilai Terhutang Pada UD. Tri Murni. Jurnal EMBA, 1(4), 1397-1404.
43. Suryana. 2003. Kewirausahaan, Pedoman Praktis: Kiat dan Proses Menuju Sukses. Salemba Empat.
44. Sutanto, O., & Nurrachman, N. 2018. Mak-na Kewirausahaan Pada Etnis Jawa, Minang, Dan Tionghoa: Sebuah Studi Rep-resentasi Sosial. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 5(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu12018-75.
45. Thompson, B. 2004. Exploratory and con-firmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psy-chological Association.
46. Tolman, E. C. 1928. Discussion: Purposive behavior. Psychological Review, 35(6), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070770.
47. Varela, N., Díaz, L. P. C., & Lezama, O. B. P. 2020. Design and implementation of a sys-tem to determine tax evasion through de stochastic techniques. Procedia Cter Sci-ence, 175, 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.094.
48. Waluyo. 2013. Perpajakan Indonesia. Salemba Empat.
49. Watson, J. B. 1913. Psychology as the be-haviourist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.
50. Wenzel, Michael. 2004. Misperceptions of social norms about tax compliance: From theory to intervention. Journal of Eco-nomic Psychology 26 (2005), 862–883.
51. Zimmerer, T., & Scarborough, N. M. 1996. Entrepreneurship and new venture for-mation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.