Main Article Content
Abstract
The research aims to find the actors who play a role, their perceptions, and how patterns of interdependence work together in implementing anti-bullying policies in the school environment. The research framework adopted the concept of network governance related to actors, perceptions, and patterns of independence and roles in policy implementation. The research was conducted for six months using qualitative methods with 19 informants from regional apparatus organizations, task forces and public and private schools, parents and related organizations. Data were collected through FGDs, interviews, documentation and observation. Triangulation of sources and actors was conducted for data validity and reliability. Data analysis was conducted interactively through data display, reduction, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that the actors involved in reducing the stunting rate in Kaur Regency were identified as 19 actors from the government, semi-government, private sector, and social community The perception of actors related to the field of anti-bullying in the school environment generally regarding the context and content of anti-bullying policies in the school environment found a gap in the form of the reluctance / attitude of victims of bullying to report cases of bullying that occurred. The research recommends strengthening the participation model, increasing campaigns, building an information technology-based complaint system and open government data.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
2. BPS Kota Lubuklinggau, “Kota Lubuklinggau Dalam Angka 2023,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.m-culture.go.th/mculture_th/download/king9/Glossary_about_HM_King_Bhumibol_Adulyadej’s_Funeral.pdf
3. BPS Kota Lubuklinggau, “Kota Lubuklinggau Dalam Angka 2023,” BPS Kota Lubuklinggau, 2023.
4. Walikota Lubuk Linggau, Keputusan Walikota Lubuk Linggau Nomor : 378/Kpts/Disdikbud/2023 Tentang Penetapan Satuan Tugas Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Kekerasan Di Lingkungan Satuan Pendidikan. 2023.
5. dan T. Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknolog Nomor 46 Tahun 2023 tentang Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan di Lingkungan Satuan. 2023.
6. E.-H. Klijn and J. Koppenjan, “Complexity in Governance Network Theory,” Complexity, Gov. Networks, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.7564/14-cgn8.
7. E. H. Klijn and J. Koppenjan, “Governance Networks in the Public Sector: An Introduction,” Gov. Networks Public Sect., no. January, 2016.
8. E. H. Klijn and J. Koppenjan, Governance networks in the public sector. 2015. doi: 10.4324/9781315887098.
9. X. Gu, “Role-Exchange Playing: An Exploration of Role-Playing Effects for Anti-Bullying in Immersive Virtual Environments,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 4215–4228, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3184986.
10. H. Shepherd, “Administering New Anti-Bullying Law: The Organizational Field and School Variation During Initial Implementation,” Law Soc. Inq., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1264–1290, 2022, doi: 10.1017/lsi.2021.76.
11. I. Y. Suryaputri et al., “The Effects of a School-Based Mental Health Program on Students’ Knowledge, Behavior, and Depression: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Four Indonesian High Schools,” J. Popul. Soc. Stud., vol. 32, 2024, doi: 10.25133/JPSSv322024.015.
12. D. J. Pepler, “An evaluation of an anti-bullying intervention in Toronto schools,” Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, vol. 13, no. 2. pp. 95–110, 1994. doi: 10.7870/cjcmh-1994-0014.
13. T. Beran, “Evaluation of an anti-bullying program: Student reports of knowledge and confidence to manage bullying,” Can. J. Educ., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 700–717, 2005, doi: 10.2307/4126451.
14. A. O’Moore, “Evaluation of the effectiveness of an anti-bullying programme in primary schools,” Aggress. Behav., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 609–622, 2005, doi: 10.1002/ab.20098.
15. L. Chen, “School-based anti-bullying strategies in Taiwan and their effects,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 59, pp. 218–223, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.09.004.
16. A. Naryakusuma and V. A. Wijaya, “Pengaruh Konten Lgbt Pada Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Cyber Bullying Pada Kalangan Remaja,” Communications, vol. 3, no. 2, 2021.
17. L. Fazry and N. C. Apsari, “Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Cyberbullying Di Kalangan Remaja,” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 2, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.24198/jppm.v2i2.34679.
18. A. S. F. Utami and N. Baiti, “Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Cyber Bullying Pada Kalangan Remaja,” Cakrawala-Jurnal Hum., vol. 18, no. 2, 2018.
19. I. Mahmudi and S. Yula Wardani, “Pengaruh Konformitas Teman Sebaya dan Intensitas Penggunaan Media Sosial terhadap Perilaku Bullying,” G-Couns J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 8, no. 01, 2023, doi: 10.31316/gcouns.v8i01.5168.
20. M. Ttofi, “What works in preventing bullying: Effective elements of anti-bullying programmes,” Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, vol. 1, no. 1. pp. 13–24, 2009. doi: 10.1108/17596599200900003.
21. Y. Li, “Preventing School Bullying: Investigation of the Link between Anti-Bullying Strategies, Prevention Ownership, Prevention Climate, and Prevention Leadership,” Appl. Psychol., vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 577–598, 2017, doi: 10.1111/apps.12107.
22. S. Rena, R. Marfita, and S. Padilah, “Implementasi Kebijakan Anti-Bullying Di Sekolah (Studi Kasus Mts Madinatunnajah Ciputat),” TAJDID J. Pemikir. Keislam. dan Kemanus., vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.52266/tadjid.v5i1.632.
23. [23] R. Widyaningtyas and Rochman Hadi Mustofa, “Implementasi Kebijakan Anti-Bullying Sekolah Adipangastuti di SMAN 1 Surakarta,” G-Couns J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 8, no. 01, 2023, doi: 10.31316/gcouns.v8i01.5489.
24. Y. Huang, D. L. Espelage, J. R. Polanin, and J. S. Hong, “A Meta-analytic Review of School-Based Anti-bullying Programs with a Parent Component,” International Journal of Bullying Prevention, vol. 1, no. 1. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s42380-018-0002-1.
25. A. Agustina, S. Raudhati, Z. Hanum, Z. Hilwa, and Nova, “SOSIALISASI DAMPAK BULLYING TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN PSIKOSOSIAL PADA KALANGAN REMAJA DI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH NEGERI 2 KABUPATEN BIREUEN,” J. Pengabdi. Masy. Bumi Raflesia, vol. 6, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.36085/jpmbr.v6i3.5705.
26. A. V. Yulianingrum, S. Suryaningsi, A. Alfina, and W. F. Kalsela, “Sosialisasi Hukum Pencegahan Tindak Kekerasaan dan Perilaku Bullying Pada Anak di TK ABA Samarinda,” Parta J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 4, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.38043/parta.v4i2.4672.
27. Didit Kurniawan Wintoko and Jason Marcelino Nugroho, “Analisis Kasus Bullying Pada Remaja Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Interaksionisme Simbolik,” ALADALAH J. Polit. Sos. Huk. dan Hum., vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i1.617.
28. W. Widyastuti and E. Soesanto, “Analisis Kasus Bullying Pada Anak,” Capital. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.
29. M. Aryuni, “STRATEGI PENCEGAHAN BULLYING MELALUI PROGRAM " SEKOLAH CARE " BAGI FASILITATOR SEBAYA (BULLYING PREVENTION STRATEGIES THROUGH THE " CARE SCHOOL " PROGRAM FOR PEER FACILITATOR),” Asian J. Environ., vol. 1, no. 1, 2017.
30. A. Prasetio and R. Fanreza, “STRATEGI SEKOLAH DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN BULLYING DI ISMAELIYAH SCHOOL,” ANSIRU PAI Pengemb. Profesi Guru Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.30821/ansiru.v7i1.14761.
31. Ismalandari Ismail, Audri Damayanti, Dita Putri Regina, Khairunnisa Az-Zahra Syamsuddin, and Muhammad Ahsan As’ad, “Bimbingan Klasikal Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Perilaku Bullying Siswa Tingkat Rendah,” Joong-Ki J. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 2, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.56799/joongki.v2i3.2038.
32. M. Aryuni, “Strategi Pencegahan Bullying Melalui Program "Sekolah Care” bagi Fasilitator Sebaya,” Asian J. Environ. Hist. Herit., vol. 1, no. 1, 2017.
33. I. U. Azmi, N. Nafi’ah, M. Thamrin, and A. Akhwani, “Studi Komparasi Kepercayaan Diri (Self Confidance) Siswa yang Mengalami Verbal Bullying dan Yang Tidak Mengalami Verbal Bullying di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 5, 2021.
34. K. Riskinanti, I. E. Lindawati, and U. M. Buana, “Studi Komparatif Persepsi Bullying antara Siswa Laki-laki dan Siswa Perempuan di SMA Kota Bekasi,” Biopsikososial, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019.
35. H. Yandri, “PERAN GURU BK/KONSELOR DALAM PENCEGAHAN TINDAKAN BULLYING DI SEKOLAH,” J. Pelangi, vol. 7, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.22202/jp.2014.v7i1.155.
36. A. J. Saputra and S. Saparahayuningsih, “Peran Guru Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Mengurangi Perilaku Bullying Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” CONSILA J. Ilm. BK, vol. 5, no. 3, 2022.
37. H. G. Ridder, M. B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and J. Saldaña, “Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook,” Zeitschrift fur Pers., vol. 28, no. 4, 2014.
38. [38] M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, 1994.
39. [39] J. Spradley, “THE ETHNOGRAPHIC INTERVIEW (from Spradley, 1979),” Introd. to Qual. Methods, 1998.
40. J. W. Creswell, Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset : Memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan. 2020.
41. Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia, Indonesia Nomor 46 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pencegahan dan Penanghanan Kekerasan di Lingkungan Satuan Pendidikan, no. Kekerasan di lingkungan satuan pendidikan. 2023.
42. Walikota Lubuklinggau, Keputusan Wali Kota Lubuklinggau Nomor : 378/KPTS/DISDIKBUD/2023 Tentang Penetapan Satuan Tugas Pencegahan dan Penanganan Kekerasan di Lingkungan Satuan Pendidikan. Indonesia, 2023, pp. 1–4.
43. M. Hill and P. Hupe, “Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance,” Sage. 2009.
44. J. Rudnick, M. Niles, M. Lubell, and L. Cramer, “A comparative analysis of governance and leadership in agricultural development policy networks,” World Dev., vol. 117, pp. 112–126, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.015.
45. R. Tajima, T. Tsuji, K. Suzuki, and A. F. Muhamad, “Conceptualizing disaster waste governance using network governance perspectives,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 99, p. 104137, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104137.