Is the temporary relocation of Gaza residents a solution?: Analysis of Indonesia's Humanitarian Diplomacy Towards the Israel-Palestina Conflict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.06.01.18Keywords:
Humanitarian Diplomacy, Temporary Relocation, Oxymoron, Common Sense, A Necessary EvilAbstract
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza, Palestine, has forced international actors to take a stand to promote humanitarian diplomacy, including Indonesia. During Prabowo Subianto’s administration, Indonesia interacted with other countries to formulate humanitarian policies to help the people of Gaza, one of which was the option of temporarily relocating the people of Gaza. This study attempts to rationalise the decision to relocate Gazans temporarily by using Larry Minear and Hazel Smith’s humanitarian diplomacy framework through three approaches: oxymoron, common sense, and a necessary evil. In addition, this study uses a literature review and analysis of news reports and speeches from official statements by the Indonesian government. The results indicate that this decision is controversial. The relocation policy contradicts two aspects: the mandate of the Indonesian Constitution and the desire of the Palestinian people to remain on the land where they have been fighting to defend their rights. However, within the framework of humanitarian diplomacy, the temporary relocation response is a pragmatic foreign policy decision by Indonesia that could be beneficial in advancing humanitarian diplomacy. With the logic of a two-state solution, Indonesia is following the steps of several Western countries and countries in the Middle East to open up adequate space for negotiation, one of which is by recognising Israel as a sovereign state when Palestine is recognised as independent. This policy also positively impacts more open access to aid, which can be effectively distributed directly to war victims. This article concludes that the humanitarian agenda has limited effects because political factors influence the continuity of humanitarian diplomacy in a crisis-affected region.
Downloads
References
2. Aitcheson, R. J., Abu-Bader, S. H., Howell, M. K., Khalil, D., & Elbedour, S. (2017). Resilience in Palestinian adolescents living in Gaza. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 9(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000153
3. Alsina, D. G., & Eldridge, D. (2025). The effectiveness of humanitarian aid in conflict zones: practitioner views on the transition from in-kind assistance to multi-purpose cash transfers. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 10(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-024-00165-6
4. Andika, M. T. (2016). An Analysis of Indonesia Foreign Policy Under Jokowi’s Pro-People Diplomacy. In Indonesian Perspective (Vol. 1, Issue 2).
5. Barakat, S. (2024). Niche small States in humanitarian diplomacy: Qatar’s positionality in the protection ecosystem. International Review of the Red Cross, 106(926), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383124000602
6. Barton, G., Yilmaz, I., & Morieson, N. (2021). Religious and Pro-Violence Populism in Indonesia: The Rise and Fall of a Far-Right Islamist Civilisationist Movement. Religions, 12(6), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060397
7. BBC Indonesia. (2023, October 11). Sejarah Jalur Gaza yang disebut ‘penjara terbuka paling besar di dunia’. BBC Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cv23n8n23d9o?utm_
8. Berhe-Tesfu, C. (1995). Humanitarian Action, Preventive Diplomacy and Advocacy: The Emerging Role of CBOs 1 and NGOs. https://academic.oup.com/ijrl/article-abstract/7/Special_Issue/220/2884356
9. Bywater, M. (2021). The humanitarian alibi: an overview and a redefinition. Journal of International Humanitarian Action, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41018-021-00106-7
10. Chandra, A. A., Sukendro, A., Uksan, A., Widodo, P., Riza, M., & Anas, F. (2024). The Role of Indonesia in Mitigating the Humanitarian Impact of the War in Gaza through Humanitarian Assistance. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph
11. CNN Indonesia. (2025, May 30). Menakar Maksud Prabowo soal Peluang RI Akui Israel, Apakah Perlu? CNNIndonesia.Com. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20250530090720-106-1234637/menakar-maksud-prabowo-soal-peluang-ri-akui-israel-apakah-perlu
12. Cook, A. D. B. (2021). Humanitarian diplomacy in ASEAN. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 6(3), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211019247
13. Darweish, M., & Sellick, P. (2017). Everyday resistance among Palestinians living in Israel 1948–1966. Journal of Political Power, 10(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1384223
14. Davutoǧlu, A. (2013). Turkey’s humanitarian diplomacy: Objectives, challenges and prospects. In Nationalities Papers (Vol. 41, Issue 6, pp. 865–870). https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2013.857299
15. Pratama, R. E., & Pratyanti, R. A. (2024). Indonesia’s Role In Promoting Peace In The Israelpalestine Conflict Through Multi-Track Diplomacy. RECHTSVACUUM: JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/rechtsvacuum.vxix.xxx
16. Emharis Gigih Pratama, & Ferdiyan. (2021). Religion and Public Diplomacy: The Role of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) in Indonesia - Afghanistan Peace Agenda. Jurnal Penelitian, 18. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v18i1
17. Gammoh, O., Sayaheen, B., Alsous, M., Al-Smadi, A., Al-Jaidi, B., & Aljabali, A. A. A. (2024). The Prevalence and Correlates of Depression, Anxiety, and Insomnia among Camp Residing Palestinian Women Migrants during the Outbreak of the War on Gaza: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan. Medicina, 60(8), 1228. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081228
18. Geremedhn, M. A., & Gebrihet, H. G. (2024). The Dynamics of Humanitarian Diplomacy During Wartime: Insights from Tigray Crisis in Ethiopia. Social Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110626
19. Gong, L. (2021). Humanitarian diplomacy as an instrument for China’s image-building. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 6(3), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911211019257
20. Husein, R., Kurniawan, B. D., & Kurniawati, N. (2024). Humanitarian Diplomacy in Action: Examining Muhammadiyah as a Model for Faith-Based Organizational Engagement. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v13i1.19673
21. Indonesia.go.id. (2025, April 13). Di ADF 2025, Prabowo Tegaskan Indonesia Konsisten pada Prinsip Bebas-Aktif. Indonesia.Go.Id. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/politik-hukum/9185/di-adf-2025-prabowo-tegaskan-indonesia-konsisten-pada-prinsip-bebas-aktif?lang=1
22. Jatmika, M. I., & Anggraheni, P. (2021). Civil Society’s Role in Indonesia’s Humanitarian Diplomacy: Study of Indonesian Religious Organizations’ Humanitarian Aid in the Crisis in Myanmar’s Rakhine State Region (2012- 2018). Politea, 4(2), 234. https://doi.org/10.21043/politea.v4i2.12792
23. LI, D. (2021). Aid as pan‐Islamic solidarity in Bosnia‐Herzegovina. American Ethnologist, 48(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13031
24. McKendrick, D., & Duarte, F. (2022). The Revolutionary Social Worker in Palestine: Living the Challenge of Colonialism through Non-violent Resistance—the Struggles of Munther Amira. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(8), 4537–4553. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac071
25. Minear, L., & Smith, H. (2007). Humanitarian Diplomacy: Practitioners And Their Craft. United Nations University Press.
26. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024, December 12). Indonesia urges UN General Assembly to realize ceasefire in Gaza. Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. https://kemlu.go.id/berita/indonesia-desak-majelis-umum-pbb-wujudkan-gencatan-senjata-di-gaza?type=publication
27. Mubin, S. (2023). ENHANCING HUMANITARIAN EFFORTS THROUGH DIPLOMATIC NETWORKS: A STUDY CASE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS HUMANITARIAN DIPLOMACY IN CREATING FUNDING MECHANISM. Jurnal Pena Wimaya, 3(2). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/gc-1864/state-parties
28. Mudore, S. B. (2019). PERAN DIPLOMASI INDONESIA DALAM KONFLIK ISRAEL-PALESTINA. Jurnal CMES, 12(2).
29. Mudzakir, J. I. (2025). Indonesia’s Support Dynamics Toward Israel: Between Solidarity and National Interests. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v6i1.309
30. Gati, M. I., & Hafid, Abd. (2024). INDONESIA’S DIPLOMATIC CONTRIBUTION TO THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT SINCE 1948. JURNAL SULTAN: Riset Hukum Tata Negara, 2(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35905/sultanhtn.v2i2.7919
31. Mu’min, M., Yulianti, D., & Sulaeman, O. (2021). Islam Nusantara and Religious Peacemaking: Nahdlatul Ulama’s Ideas in Creating Peace in Afghanistan. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 29(2), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.29.2.8945
32. Muttaqien, M. (2013). Domestic Politics and Indonesia’s Foreign Policy on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Global & Strategis, 7(1).
33. Nasir, R., & Bresheeth-Žabner, H. (2024, September 9). The people of Gaza belong in Palestine – not Canada or DRC. Aljazeera.Com. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/9/9/the-people-of-gaza-belong-in-palestine-not-canada-or-drc#:~:text=Gaza%20has%20been%20turned%20into,Palestinians%20must%20stay%20in%20Palestine
34. Pratisti, S. A., Hidayat, T., & Sari, D. S. (2019). When Solidarity is Trampled by Religious Sentiment: Outlining Indonesian Muslim Solidarity toward Rohingya Refugees. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.35732
35. Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2025, April 11). Pemerintah Indonesia Konsultasikan Dukungan Kemanusiaan untuk Palestina, Tegaskan Penolakan Relokasi Warga Gaza. Presiden Republik Indonesia . https://www.presidenri.go.id/siaran-pers/pemerintah-indonesia-konsultasikan-dukungan-kemanusiaan-untuk-palestina-tegaskan-penolakan-relokasi-warga-gaza/
36. Presiden RI. (2025, April 12). Presiden Prabowo Tegaskan Netralitas Indonesia: “Seribu Teman Terlalu Sedikit, Satu Musuh Terlalu Banyak”. Presiden Republik Indonesia .
37. Rahman, R. R. A., & Iswara, R. (2024). REFUGEES HANDLING IN INDONESIA: BETWEEN SOVEREIGNTY AND HUMANITY. Indonesia Law Journal, 17(1), 100–114.
38. Ratajczak, M., & Broś, N. (2023). Humanitarian Diplomacy: The Case of Switzerland and Sweden. Politeja, 20(1(82)), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.12797/politeja.20.2023.82.08
39. Rosyidin, M. (2017). Foreign policy in changing global politics: Indonesia’s foreign policy and the quest for major power status in the asian century. South East Asia Research, 25(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X17706570
40. Rosyidin, M. (2020). Reconciling State’s Sovereignty with Global Norms: Indonesia’s Quiet Diplomacy in Myanmar and the Feasibility of the Implementation of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Southeast Asia. Global Responsibility to Protect, 12(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01201003
41. Setiawati, S. M. (2024). The role of Indonesian government in middle east conflict resolution: consistent diplomacy or strategic shifts? Frontiers in Political Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304108
42. Slim, H. (2019). Humanitarian Diplomacy: The ICRC’s Neutral and Impartial Advocacy in Armed Conflicts. Ethics and International Affairs, 33(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679418000904
43. Sukma, R. (1997). Indonesia’s Bebas-Aktif foreign policy and the ‘security agreement’ with Australia. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 51(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719708445212
44. Sukma, R. (2003). Islam in Indonesian Foreign Policy. RoutledgeCurzon.
45. Taha, I. A., Rofii, M. S., & Riyanta, S. (2024). Rohingya Refugees: A Study of Indonesian Government Policies. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health, 3(4), 813–821. https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v3i4.298
46. Timo Antero Kivimäki. (1994). National Diplomacy for Human Rights: A Study of US Exercise of Power in Indonesia, 1974- 1979. http://www.jstor.org/stable/762452 .
47. Tiola, & Marzuki, K. I. (2021). Indonesia’s Humanitarian Engagements: Perspectives, Limitations and Prospects (pp. 67–72). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4874-5_12
48. Tulus Warsito. (2024, December 20). Diplomasi Prabowo: Redefinisi Politik Bebas Aktif? Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/diplomasi-prabowo-redefinisi-politik-bebas-aktif
49. Turunen, S. (2020). Humanitarian diplomatic practices. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(4), 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10008
50. Will Gretsky, & Leah Sarnoff. (2025, May 22). Israel’s Netanyahu says ‘it appears’ Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar was killed. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/International/israels-netanyahu-hamas-leader-mohammed-sinwar-killed/story?id=122044336
51. Zahroh Zidni, E. E. S., Zuhdi, M. L., Machmudi, Y., & Syauqillah, M. (2024). Global Jihad and Local Sentiment: The Impact of the Hamas-Israel Conflict on Radicalization in Indonesia. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 4(10), 8895–8911. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v4i10.33419
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Iqbal Yunazwardi, Syuryansyah, Yulia Rimapradesi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.