##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Submitted
Dec 4, 2024
Published
Dec 28, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 41 Download : 29

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Universities must carry out digital transformation in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Society 5.0. The application of infor-mation technology brings the hope of increasing lecturer performance and ultimately improving student quality. The use of information technology and lecturer technological competence will help achieve optimal performance. The demands of the application of information technology are thought to cause a new phenomenon known as "tech-nostress", which is the negative effects and stress triggers that arise from the use of technology in various areas of life, including the work-place. This study offers lecturer technological competence variables because they have an impact on the effectiveness of the use of infor-mation technology, so that the model built combines three important variables (use of information technology, technological competence, and technostress) to explain lecturer performance in the digital era. The study will use a quantitative survey approach to solve the prob-lem. Data were analyzed using the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to test the hypothesized relationship. The results showed that there was an influence of the use of digital technology on technostress, while digital competence had a negative influence on technostress. The technostress variable had a negative influence on lecturer performance. This study is expected to provide a better un-derstanding of how the use of information technology, technological competence, and technostress affect lecturer performance in the digi-tal era. Based on existing findings to reduce the impact of tech-nostress due to the use of digital technology, lecturers' ability to mas-ter technology must be improved. The model built can be a basis for further, more specific research, for example investigating the influ-ence of certain technologies on technostress or the moderating role of other supporting factors.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kurniawan, D., Rinandiyana, L. R., Mufreni, A. N., Budiman, A., Kurniawati, A., & Badriatin, T. (2024). Building a Model of the Influence of Information Technology Usage, Technology Competence, and Technostress on Lecturer Performance in the Digital Age. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 5(2), 837-845. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.05.02.40

References

1. Amalia, WR, Rimayanti, & Syahdan, SA (2023). Technostress and its Influence on the Performance of Lecturers at Universi-ties in Indonesia. Balance: Journal of Ac-counting and Business Research, 6(1), 34-45. Https://Jurnal.Uniraya.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Balance/Article/View/70.
2. El Kiassi, J., & Jahidi, R. (2023). Tech-nostress: A Concept Analysis. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 4(3-1), 154169. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8002337 .

3. F, Saleem F, Malik MI, Qureshi SS, Farid MF and Qamar S (2021). Technostress and Employee Performance Nexus During COVID-19: Training and Creative Self-Efficacy as Moderators. Front. Psychol. 12:595119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.595119.
4. Ferdinand, A. (2020). Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research (Sema-rang: BP UNDIP, 2020), 47-48.
5. Hair, JF, Hult., GT, Ringle., CM, & Sarstedt., M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2e Edition USA: Sage.
6. Huang, Y. &. (2021). Editorial: Transforma-tional digital marketing: Past, present, and future. Journal of Marketing, 85(2), 1-8.
7. Jurek, P., Korjonen‐Kuusipuro, K., & Olech, M. (2021). When Technology Use Causes Stress: Challenges For Contemporary Re-search. Human Technology, 17(3), 190–196. https://Doi.Org/10.14254/1795-6889.2021.17-3.1.
8. Li, L., & Wang, X. (2021). Technostress in-hibitors and creators and their impacts on university teachers' work performance in higher education. Cogn Tech Work 23, 315–330 (2021). .
9. Lieli Suharti, &. A. (2014). The Impact of Workload and Technology Competence on Technostress and Performance of Employ-ees. Indian Journal of Commerce and
Management Studies, 5(2), 01–07. Re-trieved from https://www.ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/arti .
10. Muslimin, AI (2023). TPACK-SAMR digital literacy competence, technostress, and teaching performance: Correlational study among EFL lecturers. Contemporary Edu-cational Technology, 15(2), ep409. https://doi.org/10.30935/c.
11. Rodriguez-Barboza, J.R. (2023). Exploring Technostress Effects On Job Performance Of Higher Education Peruvian English Teachers. American Journal Of Education And Technology, 2(3), 69–75. https://Doi.Org/10.54536/Ajet.V2i3.1803.
12. Saputri, CW, & Mardalis., A. (2023). The Influence Of Competency, Digital Trans-formation, Skills Updating, And Artificial Intelligence On Employee Performance At The Ministry Of Transportation Terminal Type A Tirtonadi Surakarta. Inter.
13. Sugiyono. (2016). Qualitative Quantitative Research Methods and R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
14. Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda. (2021). Impact Of Technostress On Academic Productivity Of University Students. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1647–1664 (2021). https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10639-020-10319-9.